ADVERTISMENT

Editor's letter Issue Premium

The simple system boxing needs

boxing
Getty Images
The response to Boxing News' new championship policy has been largely positive

THANKS to each of you who reached out following our new stance on world championships. The response has been hugely positive and is so encouraging.

But there has been some confusion among a minority. To be clear, at Boxing News we are not trying to create a rival organisation to any of the sanctioning bodies. Rather, we do not want to be associated with the sanctioning bodies any longer because their policies are nonsensical, untrustworthy and self-serving. One only has to look at how their ratings are compiled; fighters’ representatives will lobby for higher placements at meetings and conventions yet, to us, a fighter’s standing should already be clear from their achievements in the ring. If a sanctioning body needs to be guided by managers or promoters with vested interests then something is badly amiss. At best it is negligent, at worst it is corrupt.

All we are doing is trying to provide some much-needed clarity on the status of the leading boxers. The aim (but frankly not expectation) is for the sport to have one set of completely independent (and non-profit) rankings that everyone will follow so the meaning of contests is crystal clear. In turn, the bogus nature of many titles will be exposed.

We have reached a point where the current system – up to seven belt-holders per division – is harming the appeal of the sport. It is so splintered it has become unfollowable. If there were seven different World Cups in football, with seven different winners, the tournament(s) would cease to exist as an important competition. Imagine what that would do to football. Instead, look at what it has already done to boxing.

To my knowledge, boxing is the only sport following that self-destructive path. There will always be huge audiences for the crossover fights (of which there is generally one every few years) that highlight the appeal of truly meaningful contests. There is a clear reason why boxing struggles to crossover as often as it used to, however. Simply, it’s due to how easily the professional championship system has been manipulated so worthy rivalries, the kind that draw the masses, are circumnavigated.

If our new stance is embraced by the right people, those meaningful contests will be encouraged to take place more frequently. If it isn’t, then at least Boxing News, which will remain independent and impartial, is providing its readers with the clarity sorely lacking elsewhere.

  • A BOUT between Anthony Joshua and Tyson Fury seems a long way off after the former pulled out of his legally-obliged third bout with Deontay Wilder. The reason for the withdrawal is an outbreak of Covid-19 in the Fury camp. It is supposedly being rescheduled for October, meaning Fury-Joshua will almost certainly not take place in 2021. Fury will be 33 by the time he fights again and Wilder will be closing in on 36. Joshua will be 32 in October and Oleksandr Usyk, his likeliest next opponent, is 35 in January. For context, Muhammad Ali was 29 and Joe Frazier was 27 when they fought for the first time. If the current crop are not careful, their peaks will have disappeared before we get to see the all-conquering contest at the very top.
  • RINGSIDE CHARITABLE TRUST raised thousands of pounds at the weekend thanks to a series of fund-raising endeavours. They continue to do so without the backing of any major powerbroker in the sport. It is the only registered charity in existence that is designed purely to help boxers who are struggling in retirement. The ignorance is both bothersome and perplexing.
  • AM I the only one who fears for Manny Pacquiao, a professional since 1996 and out of the ring for two years, coming back and facing Errol Spence Jnr at the age of 42? Granted, it would be some story if he were to somehow step back in time but this is yet another example of the sport throwing together a fight that isn’t the fight. Terence Crawford should of course be Spence’s opponent.
  • IT was exceptionally distressing to hear about the passing of Seb Eubank, son of Chis Eubank Snr, over the weekend. Seb was a thoughtful young man who had so much to offer in boxing and beyond. I cannot begin to comprehend the heartache the Eubank family are feeling. Our thoughts are with them.

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

ADVERTISMENT

Boxing news – Newsletter

ADVERTISMENT

Current Issue

ADVERTISMENT

ADVERTISMENT